this horribly embarassing gap in publishing owes itself to the fact that the publisher in question has momentarily lost his mind. i am not sure where or when or how exactly this occurred, but i know that it has, indeed, occurred and i feel that before a solution can be engineered, we must first identify and diagnose the problem.
and what exactly is the problem, one might ask. and with the way my mind is working right at the moment, i would have to answer that the answer to that question is quite tricky. but, as i am trying now to focus this free range mind of mine right now, i will put it as simply as i can.
lately, i haven't been able to clearly, coherently judge films.
which is actually a problem when my small little sliver of cyberspace is devoted primarily to the art in question. it seems to me that, as of late, i am unable to even come up with a positive or negative opinion on the films that aren't blatently one way or the other. what i mean by this is that, unless a film has been either spectacular(rare) or spectacularly bad(sometimes), i can't seem to pull any sort of focused analasys from them that would color my opinion one way or the other. everything seems so caught in the middle, whether the work in question can be deemed to be mediocre or not.
a case study of my recent viewing activities will hopefully shed some light upon this problem, so that we may press forward and attempt to remedy this overarching case of the "blah's."
at this point, i wish everything were as easy to evaluate as the film 27 dresses. this is a film so mired in cliche, so caught up in the unexamined tropes of the most banal aspects of the genre of romantic comedy, that even actors the quality of the otherwise lovely judy greer seem to realize that they are floating in the middle of a shit andwich that only serves to attempt to enhance the box office appeal of the utterly awful and unlikable bitch princess katherine heigl. she sniffs my nuts. fucking terrible, but sadly enough the only slam dunk review that the week handed me.
beyond that garbage, everything else handed me a big bag of mixed emotions, or perhaps just thoughts that conflicted with knee jerk emotions, which in the end is what this is really all about anyway.
which brings me to the centerpieces of our quandry: the emotionally sublime, yet intelectually upsetting nick and norah's infinite playlist and the feeling deprived, thought provoking joe swanberg "mumblecore nadir" hannah takes the stairs.
nick and norah pasted a goofy, high school crush grim on my face from moment one and pretty much kept it there during its entire duration. i thoroughly enjoyed sitting through this film, but unfortunately when it was over, the details were almost completely forgotten like a hazy recollection of a great time spent drinking one's mind away. and then the old intellect kicked in, and i started chipping away at its lovely veneer with the type of philosophical gripes that often take over post viewing.
i complain, because it is another in a long line of films that portray the urban experience of youth in new york city as if it were the only urban atmosphere where youth can have a formative experience. just once i would like to see a film about young urban nightlife in a city more like the one i inhabit. not the "infinite" possibility of a vast metropolis. i bitch because of the relative objectification of michael cera's previous romance with tris and how it makes me feel that he is somehow more vapid than his sensitive demeanor would indicate. and oddly that makes me happy as i believe that that somehow vindicates my stereotypical belief that most indie rock dudes are like that and not like the sensitive, artistic types that they act like.
and all this leaves me questioning whether i should truly be recommending this film to people or not. i mean, i did have a good time...but it left me with a bad taste in my mouth. what to make of this film?
and then there was hannah and her stairs. this movie elicited approximately the same response as 27 dresses as while i was watching it, i was convinced that i was watching a complete turd, with a heroine as unappealing as bitch katerine herself. i found myself counting down the seconds during the awkward interactions between greta gurwig and andrew bujalski, who was terrible in reprising his sad sack role from his own deft, touching film funny ha ha,(he should stick to directing) waiting for either the end, or the infinitely cool mark duplass to come back, or fore more gratuitous nudity. i just wanted this 85 minutes to end. and it did, thankfully.
but then i started thinking. and i really dug the fact that the entire film, outside of a few exterior shots of hannah waiting for public transportation, was shot in what seemed to be rented apartment spaces. and when i thought about it i realized that this film probably cost about two bucks to make and i really started to respect that they got all that mileage out of two bucks. then i started to be impressed with the spontinaeity of the ramdom acts of nothingness that occur in this film and how they never tried to put a humorous spin on them a la seinfeld, but merely chose to let them represent themselves of acts inspired by the often times monotonous and boring existence of the every man. and a funny thing happened. i actually started to enjoy this film in hindsight.
and that got me all fucked up.
i mean, seriously, how am i supposed to rate these films on netflix?
that is what it all boils down to. it comes down to questions. what is a film's purpose? is it meant to intellectualy stimulate, or is it merely meant as a momentary diversion? is it brain candy, or food for the soul? personally, right now i don't know and i don't really care as either way, i am no closer to sipping mai-tais on the beach with my girl ashley tisdale.
but right now i am okay admitting that i have no idea, so i think i will rate them both as a three star rating on the old netflix. because i guess i liked them both, only at different times during the process and in different ways.
i wish i could find the inverse of 27 dresses...a slam dunk masterpiece.
that would make this all so much easier.
peaches.
11 October 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I really don't know what to make of Joe Swanberg. I had the exact same reaction to Kissing on the Mouth as you did to Hannah Takes The Stairs. Hannah, I enjoyed watching, but it's the type of thing I think I enjoyed more because I had seen another one of his films and I'm getting used to Bujalski's acting style (if you can call it that). I don't necessarily like the characters Greta Gerwig plays, but I think she's good at playing that character.
The gratuitous nudity in the everyday mundanity of everyday life was refreshing at first, but after 2 movies (and reading reviews of the film he and Greta co-directed) it falls somewhere between a gimmick and a crutch, while not being quite either.
I don't think Swanberg has the talent of Aaron Katz or Andrew Bujalski, although I did like him in Quiet City. I kind of equate Swanberg to Henry Jaglom. I'm glad there's somebody doing what he's doing. I just don't necessarily want to watch what he's doing. In fact, to give Swanberg credit, I would watch another one of his films and I cannot say the same for Mr. Jaglom.
Even reading you write about your inability to write is something interesting. I'm glad you took the time to do it, and I think once you started, you got rolling. It might not have been the blog you were in the mood to write, and when you started you might have felt like you had nothing to say, but it was nice to see your creative juices start flowing, and lots of comments coming out.
I just saw "Nick and Nora" last night, and I really enjoyed it. I don't think it's wonderful or great, but I enjoyed it. And it reminded me of why I love New York City when I visit. I've never had an experience like them, but watching them run around the city in the middle of night is enjoyable. I will go into a lot more details of my feelings in my own blog entry.
I'm sorry your Movie-Going hasn't been the greatest, but please don't feel like that's all your readers care about. Please don't pigeon-hole Beer Cannes into just a film place. I love your thoughts on Sports, Music, and Pop Culture as well. You can watch sports and listen to music while drinking beer, so I feel like those thoughts and social commentary belong here also...
Glad to see you writing again, I was getting bummed...
Post a Comment